Is it actually free?
Yes, and there is no email gate. You get the full report on screen, including every individual check and the evidence behind it. We would rather show the work than describe it.
We fetch your page, your robots.txt and your sitemap, measure twenty things across crawlability, structured data, AI crawler access, content and technical health, then rank what to fix. Every check shows the evidence behind it. No account, no email, nothing stored.
Status, redirects, canonical, meta robots, and whether the page can be indexed at all.
Your robots.txt parsed against six named AI crawlers, because a blocked crawler cannot cite you.
Every JSON-LD block parsed, with the schema types it declares listed back to you.
Word count, heading structure, text to markup ratio, and image alt coverage.
Measured server response, HTML weight, HTTPS, viewport, and declared language.
robots.txt and XML sitemap located, fetched and counted, plus internal link volume.
The scoring runs in code, from what the crawl actually observed. Claude reads those measurements and ranks the fixes. It is never asked to supply a number, because a score a model invented is not a score.
No account and no email. We normalise what you type, so yourcompany.com is enough.
Instant
The page, its robots.txt and its sitemap are fetched from our servers and parsed.
About 5 seconds
Twenty checks across four pillars, each scored from what was actually observed rather than estimated.
Immediate
The measurements go to Claude, which orders them by what will move the result most. It reads the data; it never supplies a number.
About 10 seconds
Plenty of audit tools now report an AI visibility score across four assistants, a share of voice against your competitors, and a count of how often each model cites you. Ask how it was measured and the answer is usually that it was not.
We do not query those systems, so we do not report on them. What we measure instead is the part you actually control and the part that has to be right before any of it matters.
If GPTBot is disallowed in your robots.txt, no amount of content strategy will get you quoted, and that is a one line fix most sites have never checked. If your page carries no structured data and two headings, there is nothing for a retrieval system to lift.
Every number in your report came from a request we made to your site while you waited. You can check any of them yourself, and we show you the evidence so you can.
Yes, and there is no email gate. You get the full report on screen, including every individual check and the evidence behind it. We would rather show the work than describe it.
No. The page is fetched, measured, scored and returned to your browser. Nothing about your site is written to a database, and there is no account to create.
No, and be careful of any tool that says it can. We do not query those systems, so we do not report on them. What we do measure is whether their crawlers are allowed to read your page at all, which is the part you control and the part that has to be right first.
Real. Every score comes from a measurement taken during the crawl, calculated in code. The model is given those measurements and asked to rank the fixes. It cannot change a score and it is never asked to guess at one.
Because a single page can be measured honestly in fifteen seconds, and most problems show up on the homepage anyway. A full site crawl is a different job with a different cost, and we would rather do the small thing properly than the big thing vaguely.
Then you have a ranked list of what to fix and can work through it yourself. Everything in the report is something your own developer can action. If you would rather we did it, the call is fifteen minutes.
Want the fixes done rather than listed?